The atmosphere in the Italian Grand Prix press conference turned fiery on Friday (Sept 6). Flavio Briatore, executive advisor at Alpine, launched serious accusations regarding the appeal process that reinstated Pierre Gasly's Monaco GP penalty. Briatore claimed one of the judges was not independent due to alleged close ties with McLaren.
The saga began with an incorrect speed measurement in the pitlane by FOM. Gasly initially lost his third-place finish after a penalty, but Alpine exercised its right of review. The FIA then agreed to rescind the penalty. However, McLaren and Red Bull appealed, and the FIA's International Court of Appeal ruled in their favor, restoring Gasly's penalties and dropping him to seventh.
Alpine had already expressed disappointment in a statement, but Briatore went further in front of the media. He alleged that one of the four judges, Filippo Marchino, acted like a "prosecutor" and had links to McLaren. Briatore even mentioned a photo of Marchino giving a speech for McLaren in 2018 at MSO Beverly Hills and a foundation that received McLaren cars.

"We accept the decision, but it's quite strange to have one guy on the panel linked to the team," Briatore said. "The judge normally needs to be completely independent."
Sitting alongside him, McLaren team principal Andrea Stella was visibly taken aback. He responded sharply, saying the conference was taking an insulting direction for McLaren's reputation. "If anybody makes these kinds of allegations, they will have to take responsibility for what they say in a public forum," Stella said.
This incident raises significant questions about the transparency of the appeal process in Formula 1. Is Briatore's accusation merely a result of disappointment, or is there a serious flaw in the system? What's certain is that tensions between Alpine and McLaren have escalated, turning a routine press conference into a tense verbal clash.
The final decision remains in favor of McLaren and Red Bull, but the controversy is far from over. Some see Briatore's move as bold, while others support the need to evaluate judicial independence. One thing is clear: this drama is not finished.



Diskusi & Komentar (0)
Mari Bergabung dalam Diskusi!
Masuk dengan mudah untuk mulai memberikan komentar, membalas, dan berinteraksi dengan pembaca lainnya.
Komentar Terbaru
Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama!